Publications by Year: 2022

2022
Song, M., Jones, C. E., Monfils, M. - H., & Niv, Y. (2022). Explaining the effectiveness of fear extinction through latent-cause inference. Neurons, Behavior, Data analysis, and Theory. PDFAbstract
Acquiring fear responses to predictors of aversive outcomes is crucial for survival. At the same time, it is important to be able to modify such associations when they are maladaptive, for instance in treating anxiety and trauma-related disorders. Standard extinction procedures can reduce fear temporarily, but with sufficient delay or with reminders of the aversive experience, fear often returns. The latent-cause inference framework explains the return of fear by presuming that animals learn a rich model of the environment, in which the standard extinction procedure triggers the inference of a new latent cause, preventing the unlearning of the original aversive associations. This computational framework had previously inspired an alternative extinction paradigm – gradual extinction – which indeed was shown to be more effective in reducing the return of fear. However, the original framework was not sufficient to explain the pattern of results seen in the experiments. Here, we propose a formal model to explain the effectiveness of gradual extinction in reducing spontaneous recovery and reinstatement effects, in contrast to the ineffectiveness of standard extinction and a gradual reverse control procedure. We demonstrate through quantitative simulation that our model can explain qualitative behavioral differences across different extinction procedures as seen in the empirical study. We verify the necessity of several key assumptions added to the latent-cause framework, which suggest potential general principles of animal learning and provide novel predictions for future experiments.
Song, M., Takahashi, Y. K., Burton, A. C., Roesch, M. R., Schoenbaum, G., Niv, Y., & Langdon, A. J. (2022). Minimal cross-trial generalization in learning the representation of an odor-guided choice task. PLOS Computational Biology , 18 (3). PDFAbstract
There is no single way to represent a task. Indeed, despite experiencing the same task events and contingencies, different subjects may form distinct task representations. As experimenters, we often assume that subjects represent the task as we envision it. However, such a representation cannot be taken for granted, especially in animal experiments where we cannot deliver explicit instruction regarding the structure of the task. Here, we tested how rats represent an odor-guided choice task in which two odor cues indicated which of two responses would lead to reward, whereas a third odor indicated free choice among the two responses. A parsimonious task representation would allow animals to learn from the forced trials what is the better option to choose in the free-choice trials. However, animals may not necessarily generalize across odors in this way. We fit reinforcement-learning models that use different task representations to trial-by-trial choice behavior of individual rats performing this task, and quantified the degree to which each animal used the more parsimonious representation, generalizing across trial types. Model comparison revealed that most rats did not acquire this representation despite extensive experience. Our results demonstrate the importance of formally testing possible task representations that can afford the observed behavior, rather than assuming that animals’ task representations abide by the generative task structure that governs the experimental design.
Langdon, A., Botvinick, M., Nakahara, H., Tanaka, K., Matsumoto, M., & Kanai, R. (2022). Meta-learning, social cognition and consciousness in brains and machines. Neural Networks , 145, 80-89. PDFAbstract
The intersection between neuroscience and artificial intelligence (AI) research has created synergistic effects in both fields. While neuroscientific discoveries have inspired the development of AI architectures, new ideas and algorithms from AI research have produced new ways to study brain mechanisms. A well-known example is the case of reinforcement learning (RL), which has stimulated neuroscience research on how animals learn to adjust their behavior to maximize reward. In this review article, we cover recent collaborative work between the two fields in the context of meta-learning and its extension to social cognition and consciousness. Meta-learning refers to the ability to learn how to learn, such as learning to adjust hyperparameters of existing learning algorithms and how to use existing models and knowledge to efficiently solve new tasks. This meta-learning capability is important for making existing AI systems more adaptive and flexible to efficiently solve new tasks. Since this is one of the areas where there is a gap between human performance and current AI systems, successful collaboration should produce new ideas and progress. Starting from the role of RL algorithms in driving neuroscience, we discuss recent developments in deep RL applied to modeling prefrontal cortex functions. Even from a broader perspective, we discuss the similarities and differences between social cognition and meta-learning, and finally conclude with speculations on the potential links between intelligence as endowed by model-based RL and consciousness. For future work we highlight data efficiency, autonomy and intrinsic motivation as key research areas for advancing both fields.